© University of Kent - Contact | Feedback | Legal
The University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NZ, T +44 (0)1227 764000
|
|
|
My publications are available from the Computer Science department publications repository.
Some selected publications:I belong to the following research groups:
My main research interests are various flavours of term rewriting, e.g. infinitary rewriting, higher-order rewriting, as well as the first-order traditional stuff. These cover the whole range from implementations, proving properties about them, to semantic models. In recent years I have been specialising on infinitary rewriting.I am also interested in functional, logic, and functional-logic programming. The whole spectrum from questions about design, usage, expressiveness, type systems, methodology, specifications, semantics, down to things like implementation techniques, efficiency considerations etc. In other words, this is more or less the whole spectrum of what some people call Euro-Theory. One (unpublished) example of that is this proof that all primitive recursive functions can be enumerated without semantic duplicates. Sadly, this turned out to be a (not very well-) known result, proved by Ersov in the early 1970s.
Currently I am teaching Functional Programming, Algorithms, Object-Oriented Programming, Logic, and Unix - listed in the order how close they are to my research.
I actually prefer FP over OOP as a programming paradigm, partly because the programs tend to be much shorter, but mostly because OOP programs are nigh impossible to reason about.
Occasionally, just occasionally I actually do write the odd little program. For example, some time of summer 1999 I spent writing an applet for the translation of regular expressions. Note the input alphabet are all alphanumeric characters, iteration is * (and +), choice is |, epsilon is %, the empty language is @, and parentheses are for grouping. After entering the input regexp (in the text field - do not forget to finish it with RETURN), the graph is transformed stepwise by continually pressing the transform button.
Being a screwed-up scientist, I obviously tried to give this piece of work the scientific treatment. One could argue though that collecting and analysing transformation rules for regular expressions from the literature is closer to trainspotting than doing science...