Ian Robert East wrote: > Somewhere (don't press me for reference) I have seen = > published surveys that support the claim of little tangible benefit. Does OO Sync with How We Think? Les Hatton, IEEE Software May/June 1998 Judith Bishop wrote: > This year we used the analyser and animator tool, LTSA from day = > one, and Wow, what a difference. = In that context, I'm a student as well, after 24 years in the = business. Occam, written with a folding editor is semi-graphical! = The LTSA analyzer is what I've been waiting for for 8 1/2 years! (Not any high-end expensive tool.) Or at least what this community = have been telling me I should wait for.. But why did I have to = input FSP to it? What's wrong with occam? (WHILE loops? Variables?) = Someone in this community was working an an occam->SMV compiler, I think. How did it go? = WHY CAN'T I INPUT IN OCCAM? It MUST be better to model check and code in the same language, eh? = -- = |=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D|=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D| | Oyvind Teig | oyvind.teig@autronica.no | | Navia Maritime AS, division Autronica | oyvind.teig@computer.org | | 7005 Trondhem | http://www.navia.no | Tel:+47 73 58 12 68 | | Norway |http://www.autronica.no | Fax:+47 73 91 93 20 | |=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D|=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D|=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D|