| 
				
				Key strengths and issues arising from student performance.  
				Including any actions taken from last year; 
				
				 Students worked very well on a case study which required 
				planning designing and evaluating elements revolving round a 
				medical supplier.  Results show that students worked well in 
				teams employing relevant software to construct very usable 
				products, with very effective design and builds which were 
				evaluated thoroughly and clearly using task based procedures.  
				This, in conjunction with an individual element, produced a good 
				overall mean result of 59% with a significant number achieving 
				 above 70%.    Work was also presented and demonstrated very 
				well indeed.  A minority did not focus on some task based design 
				aspects clearly enough.  Usability testing procedures were 
				refined this year in line with action plan and students focused 
				well on this area of user-centred evaluation.  Generally, work 
				was of a very high standard particularly in usability testing 
				areas.    |