Workshop discussions

To help make discussions more worthwhile and focused, we would like to ask you to read two other papers, although you are welcome - indeed, encouraged! - to read them all.

Over the course of the two days we will discuss each paper and will ask you to speak to your assigned papers (for not more than 5 minutes) to draw out points you thought were interesting or controversial or needed clarification.
Participants Assignment
Sherman Alpert discusses Borchers and Lin & Landay
Jan Borchers discusses Lin & Landay and Henninger, Keshk & Kinworthy
James Lin & James Landay discuss Henninger, Keshk & Kinworthy and Molina & Hernández
Scott Henninger, Mohamed Keshk & Ryan Kinworthy discuss Molina & Hernández and de Paula & Barbosa
Pedro Molina & Javier Hernández discuss de Paula & Barbosa and Pribeanu & Vanderdonckt
Maíra de Paula & Simone Barbosa discuss Pribeanu & Vanderdonckt and Gaffar, Sinnig, Javahery & Seffah
Costin Pribeanu & Jean Vanderdonckt discuss Gaffar, Sinnig, Javahery & Seffah and Schümmer
A. Gaffar, D. Sinnig, H. Javahery & A. Seffah discuss Schümmer and Tidwell
Till Schümmer discusses Tidwell and van Welie
Jenifer Tidwell discusses van Welie and Alpert
Martijn van Welie discusses Alpert and Borchers

You might like to think about some of the following, as you read, either as "conceptual issues" or for implications they may have for pattern-related tools, their design or use.

Issues to consider