© University of Kent - Contact | Feedback | Legal | FOI | Cookies
A Category Theoretical Argument Against the Possibility of Artificial Life
D Chu and W Ho
Artificial Life, 12(4):182-196, January 2006.Abstract
One of Robert Rosen's main contributions to the scientific community is summarized in his book 'Life itself'. There Rosen presents a theoretical framework to define living systems; given this definition, he goes on to show that living systems are not realisable in computational universes. Despite being well known and often cited, Rosen's central proof has so far not been evaluated by the scientific community. In this article we review the essence of Rosen's ideas leading up to his rejection of the possibility of real artificial life in silico. We also evaluate his arguments and point out that some of Rosen's central notions are ill- defined. The conclusion of this article is that Rosen's central proof is wrong.
Download publication 737 kbytes (PDF)Bibtex Record
@article{2694,
author = {D Chu and W Ho},
title = {{A} {C}ategory {T}heoretical {A}rgument {A}gainst the {P}ossibility of {A}rtificial {L}ife},
month = {January},
year = {2006},
pages = {182-196},
keywords = {determinacy analysis, Craig interpolants},
note = {},
doi = {},
url = {http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/pubs/2006/2694},
publication_type = {article},
submission_id = {3863_1206974725},
journal = {Artificial Life},
volume = {12},
number = {4},
}