To help make discussions more worthwhile and focused, we would like to ask you to read two other papers, although you are welcome - indeed, encouraged! - to read them all.
Over the course of the two days we will discuss each paper and will ask you to speak to your assigned papers (for not more than 5 minutes) to draw out points you thought were interesting or controversial or needed clarification.
| Participants | Assignment | |||
| Sherman Alpert | discusses | Borchers | and | Lin & Landay |
| Jan Borchers | discusses | Lin & Landay | and | Henninger, Keshk & Kinworthy |
| James Lin & James Landay | discuss | Henninger, Keshk & Kinworthy | and | Molina & Hernández |
| Scott Henninger, Mohamed Keshk & Ryan Kinworthy | discuss | Molina & Hernández | and | de Paula & Barbosa |
| Pedro Molina & Javier Hernández | discuss | de Paula & Barbosa | and | Pribeanu & Vanderdonckt |
| Maíra de Paula & Simone Barbosa | discuss | Pribeanu & Vanderdonckt | and | Gaffar, Sinnig, Javahery & Seffah |
| Costin Pribeanu & Jean Vanderdonckt | discuss | Gaffar, Sinnig, Javahery & Seffah | and | Schümmer |
| A. Gaffar, D. Sinnig, H. Javahery & A. Seffah | discuss | Schümmer | and | Tidwell |
| Till Schümmer | discusses | Tidwell | and | van Welie |
| Jenifer Tidwell | discusses | van Welie | and | Alpert |
| Martijn van Welie | discusses | Alpert | and | Borchers |
You might like to think about some of the following, as you read, either as "conceptual issues" or for implications they may have for pattern-related tools, their design or use.